Skip to main content
    Back to resources & insights
    Guide
    2 min read

    Engaging stakeholders: from having a say to deciding together

    Why engaging is more than consulting, how to map stakeholders, and which forms of participation work.

    For charities and non-profits, public-private partnerships and 1 moreEngagementBelongs to
    For
    Charities and non-profits, Public-private partnerships, Corporate sustainability
    Perspective
    Engagement
    Phase
    Engagement & communication, Discussion, decision & adoption
    Frameworks and methods
    Most significant change (MSC)
    Keywords
    Workshop

    A charity, a council or a company is quick to say it engages its stakeholders. Often that means a meeting, a survey, and then the board decides alone. Real engagement goes further. Whoever stands closest to a problem often knows the most about the solution.

    What we see when it works

    • Solutions fit better, because they don’t rest on assumptions.
    • People keep going longer with what they helped to think up.
    • Power to decide is shared more fairly.

    Mapping your stakeholders

    A well-known tool is a matrix of power and interest. Those with a lot of power and a lot of interest, you involve closely. Those with little of either, you keep informed.

    That matrix has a blind spot. Those with the least power often have the most at stake. Never use it as a reason to skip their voices.

    Forms of participation

    1. Designing together, with people instead of for them.
    2. Evaluating together, with participants as assessors.
    3. Collecting stories about the most significant change.
    4. Letting people tell their story in their own photos.
    5. Doing research together, with shared ownership.

    What we notice in practice

    • Pay people for their time and knowledge.
    • Choose a place, time and language that work for them.
    • Let them shape the agenda, not just the answers.
    • Be honest about what isn’t possible.
    • Show what happened with their input.

    The same goes for a partnership. A steering group that only sets the shared goals misses the voice of those who feel the effects. A company does a materiality assessment for European sustainability reporting (CSRD). It only really hears the stakeholders in its value chain when they can help decide. Otherwise it stays a tick box in the annual report.

    The question we keep asking: who here has the power to say no?

    A path with a small bridge through the reeds
    Photo: Peter Hall via Unsplash

    Need specific guidance?

    Get in touch for personalised support with your impact management question.